PI 1001-3000 AMOCs

AMOC variabilities in PI, Paleo and historical runs

ORGANIC simulation (PI)

AMOC timeseries

PI 1001-3000 AMOCs

Frequency analysis

Power spectrum Wavelet spectrum
PI 1001-3000 AMOCs power spectrum PI 1001-3000 AMOCs wavelet

EOF of MOC

PC1 PC2 PC3
AMOC PC1 AMOC PC2 AMOC PC3

Power spectrum
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
| :---: | :---: | :---: |
|MOC PC1 | MOC PC2 | MOC PC3 |

COMMENT:


EOF of SPG

PC1 PC2 PC3
SPG PC1 SPG PC2 SPG PC3

Power spectrum
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
| :---: | :---: | :---: |
|SPG PC1 | SPG PC2 | SPG PC3 |

COMMENT:


EOF of PSL

PC1 PC2 PC3
PSL PC1 PSL PC2 PSL PC3

Power spectrum
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
| :---: | :---: | :---: |
|PSL PC1 | PSL PC2 | MOC PC3 |

COMMENT:


AMOC components: FC, Ekman and UMO

Components model output vs components
img img

Power spectrum of AMOC components

PI control 1001-3000 (left figure), and its power spectrum (right figure)
| Power spectrum | Filtered timeseries |
| :---: | :---: |
| Florida Current | |
| FC | FC vs moc |
| Ekman transport | |
| ekman | ekman vs moc |
| UMO transport | |
| umo | umo vs moc |
| img | |

Power spectrums of randonly selected 100 years timeseries from the 2000 years PI control run
| Years 1401-1500 | Years 1701-1800 |
| --- | --- |
| power spectrum 1401-1500 | power spectrum 1701-1800 |

Years 2001-2100 Years 2301-2400
power spectrum 2001-2100 power spectrum 2301-2400
Years 2601-2700 Years 2901-3000
img img

AMOC in forced simulations

Compared to RapidMOC

20thC forcing NCEP forcing 1 NCEP forcing 2
AMOC from 1871-2009 AMOC from 1948-2016 AMOC from 1948-2016
Model grid: tnx1v1 (not BCCR Fast version) Model grid: mnp2 (old MICOM-ICE alone stand version) Model grid: tnx1v1 (BCCR Fast vesion, by Jörg Schwinger)
20CR AMOC, 1871-2009 H04S% NOIIANOC_mr04_hist2
20CR AMOC, 1995-2014,without SSS relax
20CR AMOC, 1995-2014,without SSS relax

Power spectrum

20CR forcing NCEP forcing 1 NCEP forcing 2
total total total
20CR AMOC power spectrum NCEP 1 AMOCs power spectrum NCEP 2 AMOCs power spectrum
Florica Current
img
Ekman transport
img
Upp-mid ocean transport
img

AMOC in paleo-simulations

AMOC timeseries

Eemian AMOCS


Power spectrum

Eemian 115ka Eemian 120ka
Eemian AMOCs power spectrum Eemian AMOCs power spectrum
Eemian 125ka Eemian 130ka
Eemian AMOCs power spectrum Eemian AMOCs power spectrum
MIS 3b PI control 1001-2000
MIS 3b AMOCs power spectrum PI ctrl 1001-2000 AMOCs power spectrum

ORGANIC simulation (PI)

Years of strong and weak AMOC

AMOC from PI years 10001-3000

(Gray-dashed lines are $$\pm 1.5 \sigma$$ AMOC)

img
img


Phase composite: strong/weak AMOCs

mmflxd

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

mmflxd (filtered)

lowpass diff (yrsmax-yrsmin) highpass diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

strmf

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

sst

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

sss

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

sealv

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

hflx

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

mld March

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

mld Annual

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

fice

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

wdstres

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

SLP

Phase of strong AMOC minus weak AMOC

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

TS

mean (yrsmax) diff (yrsmax-yrsmin)
img img

COMMENT: Bentsen2004 (figur19) shows positive NAO anomaly and warm NA/cool spg pattern. Here, shows negative NAO pattern (also wind stress)

Correlation

AMOC1

AMO MLD_LS MLD_IS MLD_GIN
img img img img
NAO1 NAO2 NAO3
img img img
NHICEA SHICEA
img img
SPG11 SPG2 SPG3
img img img

COMMENTS:


AMOC2

SPG11 SPG2 SPG3
img img img
NHICEA SHICEA
img img

AMOC3

SPG11 SPG2 SPG3
img img img

COMMENT: AMOC3 and SPG2 have similar spatial pattern, and interesting temporal correlations

MLD

LS vs IS LS vs GIN IS vs GIN
img img img

COMMENT: LS and IS is in phase, with IS leads the LS for about 1 year (consistent with Bentsen2004); GIN lead LS by 10-15 years (Bentsen2004, GIN and LS in opposite phase, linked to NAO as observations suggest)


MLD LS vs ...
| SPG1 | SPG2 | SPG3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| img | img | img|

MLD IS vs ...
| SPG1 | SPG2 | SPG3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| img | img | img|

MLD GIN vs ...
| SPG1 | SPG2 | SPG3 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| img | img | img|

FC

DrakePass spectrum vs FC
img img img
NHICEA SHICEA
img img
MLD PC1 MLD_GIN MLD_IS MLD_LS
img img img img
NAO 1 NAO 2 NAO 3
img img img
SPG 1 SPG 2 SPG 3
img img img

Comment: FC transport is positively correlated with all (3) PC of NAO

Ekman

NAO 1 NAO 2 NAO 3
img img img

Comment: Ekman transport is negatively correlated with NAO?

SPG 1 SPG 2 SPG 3
img img img

UMO

MLD1 MLD LS MLD IS MLD GIN
img img img img
NAO1 NAO2 NAO3
img img img
SPG1 SPG2 SPG3
img img img

Regression

TS

90a high-pass 90a low-pass
img img

COMMENT: Park and Latif 2008 (figure 4ab) shows negative regression on multicentennial scal and positive on multidecadal scale variability. Here not.

Trend

AMOC

8a 10a 12a
img img img
20a 50a 100a
img img img

COMMENT: The RAPID AMOC Index at 26°N shows a decline trend ( 0.265 Sv/yr) over the 12-year period of 2004–2015(Yan et al, GRL2018)